estro: (but I want to marry a princess)
( Oct. 22nd, 2008 06:41 pm)
The good sir [livejournal.com profile] mangosteen has an interesting pair of polls (and discussion) going on over on his journal. Well, I find them interesting because, at least in the case of the second, I think a lot of folks are masturbating their ideals rather than actually being honest with themselves. (The first one and the second one).

Now, while I believe that many of the "No deal" folks in the second case hold the ideals that voting is a moral requirement that no amount of money should dissuade one from. The question I ponder is "what makes it a duty?" Just the act of being a citizen? Or is it the voicing of your beliefs about a cause (causes) that one supports?

If it is the latter, then it seems reasonable that if voting is worth passing up $10K for the sake of making your voice heard, then it would be worth putting $10K (or a noteworthy amount of time and effort) into supporting those causes. Some of you have done that (Yay, [livejournal.com profile] xthread for stumping in Nevada. Yay [livejournal.com profile] fightingwords for your work with Just Cause. [livejournal.com profile] mikeys and others have donated to No on 8, w00t!).

But how many folk are telling themselves that they would pass up $10K for the sake of voting but haven't even bothered to do more than a "these are my positions" LJ post? If, upon reading [livejournal.com profile] mangosteen's second poll, you really believe voting on your causes are worth passing up 10K for, then you might want to consider giving of yourself to support them. A couple hours of your time phone banking, helping get fellow voters to the polls, and the like, can get more votes than just your one for your cause(s).

(An yes, I would totally take the 10K as I am broke and hungry.)
estro: (but I want to marry a princess)
( Oct. 22nd, 2008 06:41 pm)
The good sir [livejournal.com profile] mangosteen has an interesting pair of polls (and discussion) going on over on his journal. Well, I find them interesting because, at least in the case of the second, I think a lot of folks are masturbating their ideals rather than actually being honest with themselves. (The first one and the second one).

Now, while I believe that many of the "No deal" folks in the second case hold the ideals that voting is a moral requirement that no amount of money should dissuade one from. The question I ponder is "what makes it a duty?" Just the act of being a citizen? Or is it the voicing of your beliefs about a cause (causes) that one supports?

If it is the latter, then it seems reasonable that if voting is worth passing up $10K for the sake of making your voice heard, then it would be worth putting $10K (or a noteworthy amount of time and effort) into supporting those causes. Some of you have done that (Yay, [livejournal.com profile] xthread for stumping in Nevada. Yay [livejournal.com profile] fightingwords for your work with Just Cause. [livejournal.com profile] mikeys and others have donated to No on 8, w00t!).

But how many folk are telling themselves that they would pass up $10K for the sake of voting but haven't even bothered to do more than a "these are my positions" LJ post? If, upon reading [livejournal.com profile] mangosteen's second poll, you really believe voting on your causes are worth passing up 10K for, then you might want to consider giving of yourself to support them. A couple hours of your time phone banking, helping get fellow voters to the polls, and the like, can get more votes than just your one for your cause(s).

(An yes, I would totally take the 10K as I am broke and hungry.)
.

Profile

estro

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags